DASAV     Bibliography     Mayerson    

As of March 19, 2007:

The Hackenblog has moved to http://hackenblog.hackenbush.org/ or www.hackenblog.com.

Please update your links, thank you.
Hello Readers! If you're liking what you're reading here, you can help out with the webhosting bill with a donation, if you are so inclined. In addition to my eternal gratitude, you'll have the comfort of knowing I won't be spending it on frivolous things like food or the electric bill or something.

[Previous entry: "NYT on blogs"] [Main Index] [Next entry: "Bill Bennett redux"]

05/18/2003 Entry: "MVRD: North Dakota"

The Mayerson Voter Registration Drive looks up and a little to the right

People of North Dakota:

Your Federal money is in danger! In 2001, for every $1 in taxes paid to the Feds, NoDak received $1.95 back in Federal spending. NoDak voted for bush in 2000.

Contrasted with California, where for every $1 in taxes we paid to the Fed, we got $.82, yes, 82 cents, back in Federal spending. California voted for Gore in 2000.

AngryBear has a chart so you can know I'm not making this stuff up. And he's an economist, so he's not making it up either. Paul Krugman had a column on this over a year ago, and he's Paul Krugman, so you know he knows.

People of North Dakota! Vote your wallets! Vote out those tax slashing Republicans! They're trying to take California's money away from you!

Holy Cow! North Dakota does not have voter registration!

"North Dakota is the only state that does not require voters to register. Because of the state's rural character, elections are conducted in numerous small precincts where election board members know the voters who come to the polls and easily detect those who should not be voting in the precinct. Many precincts keep a list of voters who have voted in previous elections. When a voter appears at the polling place, the poll worker looks for the voter's name on the list. If found, the voter's name and address are verified and the voter is allowed to vote. If a voter's name is not on the list, he may be asked to sign an affidavit swearing to the fact that he is a qualified elector. If the voter agrees to sign the affidavit, he must be allowed to vote. If he refuses to sign, he may be denied the right to vote."
Voter Registration Procedures in Minnesota and North Dakota

There's more information here, from the NRA, of course: http://www.nraila.org/VoterInfo.asp?FormMode=StateVotingInfo&State=ND about voter registration in NoDak.

And, of course, the League of Women Voters, has this information:

NORTH DAKOTA, (701) 328-4146, http://www.state.nd.us

And that link goes to this link: http://discovernd.com/ which has a link to this link: http://discovernd.com/egovernment.html, which seems to be all the online state government stuff there is in NoDak.

Edit: Oooh, Uggabugga has this very cool graphic on the red, blue and green(!) states, taxes and spending.

True Blue Americans

SYNOPSIS: If Blue States already subsidize small rural populations in Red States, why is Bush handing out even more to them in this Farm Bill?

Remember how hard New York's elected representatives had to fight to get $20 billion in aid for the stricken city - aid that had already been promised? Well, recently Congress agreed to give farmers $180 billion in subsidies over the next decade. By the way, the population of New York City is about twice as large as America's total farm population.

I've been a stern critic of the Bush administration, but this is one case where Democrats in the Senate were the lead villains. To its credit, the administration initially opposed an increase in farm subsidies, though as in the case of steel protection, it didn't take long before political calculation trumped the administration's alleged principles. But politics aside, maybe the farm bill debacle will help us, finally, to free ourselves from a damaging national myth: that the "heartland," consisting of the central, relatively rural states, is morally superior to the rest of the country.

You've heard the story many times: the denizens of the heartland, we're told, are rugged, self-reliant, committed to family; the inhabitants of the coast are whining yuppies. Indeed, George W. Bush has declared that he visits his stage set - er, ranch - in Crawford to "stay in touch with real Americans." (And what are those of us who live in New Jersey - chopped liver?)

But neither the praise heaped on the heartland nor the denigration of the coasts has any basis in reality.

I've done some statistical comparisons using one popular definition of the heartland: the "red states" that - in an election that pitted both coasts against the middle - voted for Mr. Bush. How do they compare with the "blue states" that voted for Al Gore?

Certainly the heartland has no claim to superiority when it comes to family values. If anything, the red states do a bit worse than the blue states when you look at indicators of individual responsibility and commitment to family. Children in red states are more likely to be born to teenagers or unmarried mothers - in 1999, 33.7 percent of babies in red states were born out of wedlock, versus 32.5 percent in blue states. National divorce statistics are spotty, but per capita there were 60 percent more divorces in Montana than in New Jersey.

And the red states have special trouble with the Sixth Commandment: the murder rate was 7.4 per 100,000 inhabitants in the red states, compared with 6.1 in the blue states, and 4.1 in New Jersey.

But what's really outrageous is the claim that the heartland is self-reliant. That grotesque farm bill, by itself, should put an end to all such assertions; but it only adds to the immense subsidies the heartland already receives from the rest of the country. As a group, red states pay considerably less in taxes than the federal government spends within their borders; blue states pay considerably more. Over all, blue America subsidizes red America to the tune of $90 billion or so each year.

And within the red states, it's the metropolitan areas that pay the taxes, while the rural regions get the subsidies. When you do the numbers for red states without major cities, you find that they look like Montana, which in 1999 received $1.75 in federal spending for every dollar it paid in federal taxes. The numbers for my home state of New Jersey were almost the opposite. Add in the hidden subsidies, like below-cost provision of water for irrigation, nearly free use of federal land for grazing and so on, and it becomes clear that in economic terms America's rural heartland is our version of southern Italy: a region whose inhabitants are largely supported by aid from their more productive compatriots.

There's no mystery about why the heartland gets such special treatment: it's a result of our electoral system, which gives states with small populations - mainly, though not entirely, red states - disproportionate representation in the Senate, and to a lesser extent in the Electoral College. In fact, half the Senate is elected by just 16 percent of the population.

But while this raw political clout is a fact of life, at least we can demand an end to the hypocrisy. The heartland has no special claim to represent the "real America." And the blue states have a right to ask why, at a time when the federal government has plunged back into deficit, when essential domestic programs are under assault, a small minority of heavily subsidized Americans should feel that they are entitled to even more aid.

Originally published in The New York Times, 5.7.02




Powered By Greymatter

Hello Readers! If you're still liking what you're reading here, you can help out with the webhosting bill with a donation, if you are so inclined. In addition to my eternal gratitude, you'll have the comfort of knowing I won't be spending it on frivolous things like food or the electric bill or something.

One of the best deals anywhere.

Donations to keep us going are very welome!

Donate towards our web hosting bill!

Our webhost, is a really good deal and is probably having a huge sale on something as we speak. If you're looking for webhosting, I recommend them very much.

BugMeNot.com for passwords to online sites.

Who links to me?

Updated: April 8, 2006

Reviews you can use at J LHLS Reviews

This is a page in a larger site called Hackenbush.org. Click here to go there.

© Copyright, Head Designs 2003
All rights reserved.

referer referrer referers referrers http_referer